On the California Trail, 1850—Traveling in Comfort

I have been reading Covered Wagon Women: Diaries and Letters from the Western Trails, 1850. This is the second volume in an eleven volume series devoted to women’s journals of the westward movement.

I am quite intrigued with the journal of Margaret Frink, who with her husband Ledyard decided to journey to California in 1850. They were a childless couple living a pleasant and prosperous life in Martinsville, Indiana. News of “the delightful climate and abundance of gold” in California gave them the notion to set out, although no one else they knew from their region was going.

The first order of business was to have a suitable wagon built for the journey. Margaret Frink goes into detail on the fitting out of the wagon:

The wagon was built expressly for the trip, it being built light, with everything planned for convenience. It was so arranged that, when closed up, it could be used as out bedroom. The bottom was divided off into little compartments or cupboards. After putting in our provisions and other baggage, a floor was constructed over all, on which out mattress was laid. We had an India-rubber mattress that could be filled with either air or water, making a very comfortable bed. During the day we could empty the air out, so that it took up but little room.

Who knew that folks had air mattresses and water beds in 1850? I didn’t. Margaret Frink was using an air mattress that had to be blown up by hand with air from human lungs, just like a camping trip from my youth, before they had electrical pumps built into air mattresses.

But it turns out that India rubber was all the rage in the early 19th century, when rubber started being used to make galoshes and other water-proof items. And when Charles Goodyear in the U.S. and Thomas Hancock in England simultaneously discovered vulcanization in 1843, the industry took off like a rocket, and all kinds of wonderful, flexible, water-proof items began appearing, including Margaret Frink’s India rubber air mattress.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Questions for Teachers’ Examination 1889

2. A druggist buys quinine at $5 a pound avoirdupois and retails it at 10 cents a dram apothecaries’ weight. What per cent profit does he make?

Stumped? Then you probably wouldn’t qualify as a teacher in 1889. This is the second question (the first was hard to make out in the photocopy) of Questions for Teachers’ Examination published in the Oroville Register in June 1889. There is no indication of how or when or where the exam was to be given; the article is simply a list of questions with no answers. I assume that the questions were published as a study guide for prospective teachers.

If you think that question from the Arithmetic section is too difficult, maybe one of the Mental Arithmetic questions will be easier. After all, you are supposed to be able to do this one in your head.

1. 10 1/2 is what percent of 12? (I was never good at percentages. Let’s try another one.) 4.  Sold a horse for $90 and lost 25 per cent, what should he have been sold for to gain 25 per cent? (Hmmm . . .  more percentages. Let’s try something else.)

Grammar. 1. Construct sentences using “for” as a conjunction, “but” as a preposition, “that” as a relative pronoun, “what” as an adjective, and “only” as an adverb. (Hey, I think I can do this one!)  2. Give sentences containing clauses used; 1st, as the antecedent of a pronoun; 2nd, as the object of a preposition; 3rd, as an attribute; 4th, in opposition; 5th, as the subject of a sentence.  (Yikes! let’s try the next section.)

Geography. 1. Define physical, political, and mathematical geography. Name the lines on the earth that are the limit of the sun’s vertical rays. (Not sure about mathematical geography, but I’m pretty sure that the lines are the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.)  6. What articles do we export to South America? What imports do we get from there?

U.S. History. 1. Relate the causes which led to the settlement of Virginia, Georgia, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. 4. Locate and state of what historical interest is each of the following: West Point, Coloma, Fanueil Hall, Mt. Vernon, St. Augustine?  (I think I could do a pretty fair job at this. In fact, so far U.S. History is my best subject in this exam.)

Physiology. 1. Describe the greater and lesser circulation of the blood. (Okay, as long as you don’t want all the correct terminology.)

Theory and Practice (of Education). 1. Write a program for use in a country school of twenty pupils of mixed grades. (You are preparing to be a teacher of everything to everyone.)  5. What steps would you take to awaken a desire for knowledge outside of the textbooks? (Good question!)

Composition and Penmanship. Six topics for a one-page essay are given, including “A Fishing Trip,” “The Story of a Five-Dollar Piece,”, and “Our Country.”

Book-keeping. 1. Give the use of the following terms: sundries, inventory, account, assets, stock. (I wouldn’t do well in this section, but I might be able to muddle through.)

Orthography. That means spelling. A list of 50 tricky words is given that the candidate should be able to spell, such as accessory, vermilion, trafficking, thralldom, complaisance, and Tuolumne.

Vocal Music. (Yes, the teacher is expected to teach the children to sing.) 1. What is singing. What is a tone? How is the length of tones indicated in music?

Word Analysis. 2. Define each of the following and name and define a derivative formed from each: logos, demos, cratos, philos, bios. (It’s all Greek to me, but I think I could do this one.) 5. Give the derivation of the following: tantalize, good-bye, husband, calculate, boycott, daisy, guillotine, dahlia, capricious, agriculture. (I like word origins; I could get most of these.)

Entomology. 1. Describe the metamorphosis of the silkworm moth. 2. Describe some common representatives of Orthoptera, Coleoptera. (Hmmm . . . it’s getting harder. Got to get out the bug book.)

Industrial Drawing.  1. Using nothing but straight lines, draw a tea pot, a table, a chair. (That’s going to be one angular teapot.)

Natural Philosophy. (That’s Physics to you.) 1. Define “atmospheric pressure”; the different kinds of levers. State upon what principle an artesian well acts. 8. How was the velocity of light determined? What is its velocity? (Oops. I’d have to read up on that.)

Algebra. 1. State the difference between a co-efficient and an exponent. Between a factor and a term. (This is followed by a bunch of algebra problems and I am in trouble again.)

Rhetoric. 1. What is rhetoric? State its relation to grammar.

Constitution and School Law.  1. How may a bill in Congress become a law without the President’s signature? In whom is the judicial authority of the United States vested? For what term of office? (And other questions about civics and government.) 2. Define suffrage. Who are entitled to vote in California? (Not female school teachers who could pass an exam like this and handle 30 students of all ages in a one-room schoolhouse, but were not considered competent to vote in 1889.)

Natural History.  1. Define perianth, ovary, cotyledon, endogen, tuber. 4. To what sub-kingdom and class does each of the following belong: whale, frog, spider, horse, alligator. (Brush up your biology!)

So there you have it: a few sample questions for graduates of the Chico Normal School who plan to teach in Oroville, Gridley, Bald Rock, Concow, Nimshew, or any of the other little schools scattered around Butte County. How do you measure up to a schoolteacher of 1889?

Posted in Education | Leave a comment

John Bidwell and Pres Longley

The book on Pres Longley, edited by John Rudderow and myself, is out! If you are interested in The Miner Poet: Poems of Pres Longley, it is available at Lyon Books, Paradise Coin and Gift, Bidwell Mansion, and from the editors. Just contact us at theminerpoet@gmail.com.

Pres Longley, the poet of Helltown and the bard of Butte, was well-known in Butte County for his verse, which appeared in the local papers. He knew John Bidwell pretty well. I went looking through John Bidwell’s diary to find out when he first mentions Pres.

In 1877 Bidwell was involved in building a fair pavilion in Chico for the County Fair. He was always a great supporter of agricultural fairs. Pres wasn’t much involved with agriculture, but he did like fairs, and he was in town for this one.

Bidwell’s journal entries are brief, but he always listed whoever had called on him that day. On Saturday September 28 Bidwell lists Longley as one of his callers. The fair was due to open on Monday, but because of rainy weather, it was delayed until the following day, October 1, when Bidwell notes: Fair: opened in the Pavilion – Pres. Longley [Butte Creek miner noted for his poetry on local subjects] delivered the poem.

If you needed a poem for the opening of a Fair, or a Fourth of July celebration, or any other notable occasion, Pres Longley was the man to provide the verse. Among the remarks and orations there was always a place for a poem to commemorate the event. Whether his lines were recorded and preserved I do not know, but I suspect they were not, or else John Rudderow would have found them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Anvil Firing

I have learned a lot about old times in California as I have worked on editing this book on Pres Longley, the miner poet. Yesterday John Rudderow, the instigator of this project, told me about the old custom of “firing the anvil” on the 4th of July.anvil

Want to make a lot of noise and don’t have a cannon? Not to worry, you can have the same level of excitement and racket with a couple of anvils and some black powder. Every town had at least one blacksmith who had the necessary equipment, so it wasn’t hard to arrange.

(I don’t recommend trying this at home, even if you do happen to have an anvil. Could be dangerous.)

Take one anvil and turn it upside down. On the underside is a hollow about the size of a brick. Pour in some gunpowder and place a fuse or a trail of gunpowder. Then place the other anvil right side up on top. When you light off the gunpowder, you will get a terrific explosion and the top anvil will fly at least a hundred feet in the air. It will come down too, so clear the deck.

To see some anvil firing, go to YouTube or take a look at this one. Or go up to Weaverville on the 4th of July. It looks like they are still firing anvils at their celebration.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Pres Longley, the Bard of Butte

I have a new project that I’ve been working on for the past month or so, and I am hoping it will be a book soon. I am helping to edit a book of poems by Pres Longley, the poet of Helltown, the Bard of Butte, friend of John Bidwell, resident of Butte Creek Canyon, a miner poet.

Alexander Preston Longley came to California with his brother in 1852 after spending two years fighting Comanches with the Texas Rangers. He prospected here and there in Northern California, finally settling in 1866 at Boneyard Flat near Butte Creek. For sixty years he wrote poems about life in California: verse about his miner friends, tributes to pretty girls, eulogies of dearly departed pets, patriotic poems, humorous pieces, comments on the passing scene.

I think you will like getting to know Pres Longley and reading his verse. Here is a small sample:

You may wrangle and rave of your Marysville girls,

     Of the girls of the Capital City,

Of the ‘Frisco girls, with their fads and their curls,

     But the Butte Creek girls are most pretty;

Their smiles are far dearer to me than the gold

     That the millionaire hides in his coffers,

And I hope, ‘ere the days of this leap year are told,

     Some dear one will make me an offer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I’m Back!

Sorry I dropped the ball here at the Bidwell blog. I’m ready to get back to blogging, although I’m not making any big promises. But I should be showing up occasionally with some tidbits about John Bidwell and his world.

An announcement! Next Sunday, January 27th, is the date for the annual meeting of the Bidwell Mansion Society at the Visitor’s Center at Bidwell Mansion SHP. You don’t have to be a member to attend, although we welcome new members.

There will be a reception for members at 5:30 p.m. followed by a meeting at 6:00. New board members will be introduced, departing ones will be extolled, and the revised by-laws will be presented for a vote of approval. Then on to the speaker–

The guest speaker is Valerie Sherer Mathes, professor of history at City College of San Francisco. A specialist in American women’s history and Native American history, she is the author of Helen Hunt Jackson and Her Indian Reform Legacy, coauthor (with Richard Lowitt) of The Standing Bear Controversy: Prelude to Indian Reform, and editor of The Indian Reform Letters of Helen Hunt Jackson.

Her newest book is Divinely Guided: The California Work of the Women’s National Indian Association, published in 2012 by Texas Tech University Press.  The WNIA was a favorite cause of Annie Bidwell, and the book contains chapters on Annie’s work with the Mechoopda Indians and the WNIA’s famous Indian boarding school in Greenville, Plumas County.

See you there!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“By a Little Exertion”

After his experience at the disastrous 1860 Democratic National Convention—the one that split the party in two—John Bidwell came home to California and attended the state convention that would nominate a candidate for governor. He wanted the job. In 1867, writing to Annie about his life and political career, he said:

I was so sustained by the people of California that I could have been elected to almost any office, as I believe — In 1861 I could by a little exertion have been nominated for governor — came very near it without making any exertion.

So why did he not exert himself?

Bidwell lived in the day when, ideally, the political  job sought the man, rather than the man seeking the job.  He expected the party to seek him out as the best candidate, and support him. He didn’t consider it proper that he should put himself forward. Bt not exerting himself, he eventually (after fourteen ballots) lost the nomination to John C. Conness.

Note that this is the version that he told Annie. Annie, with her high ideals, wanted him to be the man that others would seek, rather than the politician who went looking for a public office to fill. So he is telling Annie what he thinks she wants to hear.

He also doesn’t mention that he wouldn’t have won the governorship anyway. This was after the Democratic Party tore itself in two. He was at the Union Democrat convention–the convention of Democrats loyal to the Union. What the pro-South Democrats were doing I’m not sure, but they didn’t support Conness or the Republican candidate. With the Democratic vote divided, Republican Leland Standford, became governor of California. And the next time around, Bidwell would be a Republican too.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bidwell on the 1860 Democratic Convention

In 1891, John Bidwell dictated a memoir in which, among many other things, he recalled his career in politics. Here is what he had to say about his role at the 1860 National Democratic Convention:

When I was sent as a delegate to the Charleston convention in ’60 . . . and saw that the south meant disunion, I could not agree with them. I differed with all the other delegates from California and Oregon, Senator Gwin was one of them, and Senator M.S. Latham was another, and while he was from Ohio, he was under the influence of the southern democracy. . . . I returned to Washington, and the convention made no nomination.

Afterward one wing held its convention and nominated Breckenridge, and the other wing nominated Douglas. Of course, I was with Douglas. After I got back to Washington, on my way home to California, Stephen A. Douglas, before he was nominated for president, sent for me. He wanted to see the man that had dared to differ with Gwin and the rest of them from California. They called me the black sheep and everything else, but that did not hurt me.

When I got home to California, Gwin and Frank Washington called upon me. The latter was the finest political writer on the coast. He was the leader of the southern democracy here. They stayed with me and talked almost until midnight, to try and induce me to vote for Breckenridge. I treated them very politely, took them in my carriage to the county seat, and bid them goodbye. I never could be persuaded to yield to the disunion element that was growing up at the time.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bidwell Goes for the Governorship, Part I

John Bidwell would have told anyone who asked him that all he ever wanted to be was a farmer, and a farmer he was, albeit on a grand scale. But he had political ambitions too. Not like William C. Gwin, who came to California specifically to become a U.S. senator and succeeded in his ambition, but in the sense that he wanted to help California progress and he wanted to rise to the top. He was intelligent, energetic, and fair-minded–he would have made a great governor.  Unfortunately he never made it to the pinnacle of state government.

His first try came in 1861. He had been, throughout the 1850’s, a Democrat. He helped organize the Democratic Party in California. The Democrats dominated politics for most of the decade.  In 1860 Bidwell went to the national Democratic Convention in Charleston, South Carolina as one of eight delegates from California.

It was at this point that the Democrats went from being the predominate force in American politics to a party riven by sectionalism. Bidwell was a “Douglas” Democrat, backing Senator Stephen A. Douglas for the nomination. But the other seven California delegates, led by Senator William Gwin, were part of the pro-Southern and pro-slavery faction of the party. Although Douglas had been the front-runner leading up to the convention, the Southern wing of the party blocked his nomination.  Ballot after ballot was taken, no candidate was nominated, and the convention and the party fell to pieces.

Bidwell gave his proxy for Douglas to a friend and went back to California. The warring Democrats held two separate conventions nominating rival candidates, Douglas and Breckinridge, and thus insured the election of the Republican candidate, Abraham Lincoln.

Back in California Bidwell’s name was put forward for governor at the 1861 convention of Union Democrats. Four other men vied for the nomination and in the end it went to John C. Conness.  Just as the Democrats were divided on the national level, so were they split in the state, and they could not win. Leland Stanford became California’s first Republican governor.

It was Bidwell’s last hurrah as a Democrat. A staunch Union man, he was disgusted with the Democrats who supported secession. He and other Democrats who stood for the Union merged with the Republicans to form what was then called the Union Party, but would eventually simply be the Republican Party.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Governor’s Mansion

Yesterday Jim and I visited Governor’s Mansion State Historic Park in Sacramento, another one of the state parks that was slated for closure last year.  Thankfully, that unfortunate chapter in state parks history is behind us, for the time being at least, and we can go on enjoying the marvelous variety of natural and cultural sites that belong to the people of California. 

The Governor’s Mansion is a wonderful example of Victorian Gothic architecture. Our guide called it second-generation Italianate. Bidwell Mansion is good example of first-generation California Italianate architecture (built 10 years before the Governor’s Mansion), and it is interesting to note the similarities and differences. Both are three story buildings with a basement and a tower. Both have the same kind of decorative wooden brackets around the eaves. Both of them have a similar layout: public rooms on the first floor, bedrooms and servants quarters on the second floor, ballroom on the third floor.  (We didn’t get to see the ballroom–it’s under renovation.)

Both were up-to-date buildings in their day, with running water and flush toilets and all the latest in innovative interior design.

Bidwell Mansion is a broader, more expansive building, with a stucco exterior; the Governor’s Mansion is narrower and seems taller, and is all built of wood, with lots more “gingerbread” decoration. My guess is that, back in the day, Bidwell Mansion was cooler in the summertime, and if you had the choice of which one to live in, Bidwell Mansion would be more comfortable overall.

The Governor’s Mansion was built in 1877 by wealthy merchant Albert Gallatin. In 1903 it was sold by its second owners, the Steffens family, to the state to be used as an executive residence. Twelve governors from George Pardee to Ronald Reagan lived here, but the Reagans moved out after only four months. Here’s how an article in the Sacramento Bee described their reaction:

Here is how political journalist Lou Cannon described the story about the house in his 2003 book, “Governor Reagan, his rise to power:”
“Trading Pacific Palisades was bad enough. Living in a relic that was more suitable as a museum (which it is today) was unthinkable. Nancy Reagan rebelled. She realized that the mansion, which had ropes in the bedrooms instead of fire escapes, was a ‘firetrap.’ A rusted screen that wouldn’t budge covered the window of her son’s second-story bedroom. In case of fire, her son was supposed to smash the screen by running at it with a bureau drawer and then climb onto the roof. Nancy Reagan had no difficulty in persuading her husband to move out of the mansion.
“The Reagans, at their own expense, leased a two-story twelve-bedroom Tudor house in  an exclusive section of eastern Sacramento.”

“Firetrap” was a good excuse, but no doubt Nancy Reagan had other reasons. Antiquated bathroom fixtures, small bedrooms, inadequate space for entertaining, a location right on a busy street—it’s a great place to visit but she didn’t want to live there.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment