Nikolai and Conchita

Artist's conception of Maria de Concepcion Arguello.

Artist’s conception of Maria de Concepcion Arguello. (Conchita)

In 1805-06 Nikolai Rezanov spent a miserable winter in the Russian outpost at Sitka. Life in the Russian colony was beyond wretched: the log cabins were cold and damp, the food stores were dwindling, the clothing was infested with vermin, the men suffered from scurvy, and there was no work to keep  them occupied—nothing to do but drink, brood, and fight.

In desperation, and in spite of winter storms, Rezanov put to sea and headed south to California. On March 28, 1806 the ship sailed into San Francisco Bay. They were welcomed by the Spanish, who had been expecting a Russian exploratory expedition to arrive. Rezanov was not that expedition, but he didn’t mention that. He told the comandante that he had been entrusted by his emperor with command over all his American territories (i.e., Alaska), and had come to California on orders to confer with the governor of the neighboring territory. This was not precisely true, but it was better than admitting that he and his men were starving.

The commander of the Presidio was Don Jose Dario Arguello. At dinner Rezanov met his gracious wife and eleven of the Arguello’s thirteen children. The eldest daughter was Maria de Concepcion, known to her family as Conchita. Fifteen years old, she was considered “the beauty of the two Californias.” She was tall and slender, with clear fair skin and sparkling brown eyes.

After a stinking, starving winter in Sitka, it’s not hard to see why Nikolai Rezanov fell for Conchita. She was not only beautiful; she was lively, charming, and kind. But what did Conchita see in the 42-year-old emaciated widower from Alaska?

Stay tuned for more of the story of Nikolai and Conchita.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Russian-American Company

Nikolai Rezanov had a vision that went beyond helping his father-in-law corner the fur market in Siberia. To successfully expand the fur trade and make Russia the dominate force in the North Pacific, he would follow the example of British merchant-adventurers and form a government-backed corporation.

The British East India Company was the powerhouse behind Britain’s imperial expansion and accumulation of wealth. Rezanov wanted to do the same thing in Alaska that Britain had done in India: colonize the land, exploit the natives, and extract the wealth. With the backing and the assets of the Shelikhov family, and his connections at the imperial court, he was well-placed to make his vision a reality.

Rezanov went to work in St. Petersburg, publicizing, persuading, bribing. His chief argument was that if Russia didn’t move swiftly into the North Pacific, Britain, or maybe Spain, would, threatening the security of the Russian Empire from the east. He soon had his charter, with a list of shareholders headed by the Tsar himself. It gave the Russian-American Company a monopoly on all trade and natural resources in Alaska, the Aleutian Islands, and islands north of Japan.

But Rezanov envisioned an even greater empire. Why shouldn’t Russian control extend even further south, to California and the Hawaiian Islands? With bases rimming the Pacific Ocean, from the Chinese border right round to the San Francisco Bay, Russia could dominate commercial traffic in the Pacific.

How different our world might be if his vision had come to pass.

Posted in Nikolai Rezanov, Russian American Company | Leave a comment

The Russians Are Coming! The Russians Are Coming!

With the Winter Olympics taking place in Sochi, Russia, now is a good time to look at the Russians in California. Although that’s not really my motivation; my inspiration comes from an excellent new book: Glorious Misadventures: Nikolai Rezanov and the Dream of a Russian America, by Owen Matthews. It is a long and detailed account of Rezanov’s adventures as an explorer and colonist in Siberia, Alaska, California and even Hawaii.

N.P. Rezanov

N.P. Rezanov

Nikolai Petrovich Rezanov was born in St. Petersburg in 1764. A nobleman of modest means, he rose through the ranks of the imperial bureaucracy by means of his energy, intelligence, and obsessive attention to detail. He was good with numbers, but he also knew how to make himself agreeable to those he wished to influence. He had all the attributes that would make him a rising star in the court of Catherine the Great.

In 1793 Rezanov’s fortunes turned to the east when he was appointed the court’s representative to keep an eye on Grigory Shelikhov, the “King of Siberia,” the John Jacob Astor of the Siberian fur trade, who had come to St. Petersburg seeking  permission to extend his ventures to Alaska.  Rezanov did more than supervise Shelikhov, he married his oldest daughter Anna. Nikolai was 32, Anna was 14, a not unusual age difference for that time.

It is difficult in this age of heated houses, heated cars, heated everything, to imagine how vital the fur trade was. It wasn’t just a matter of beaver hats being fashionable for men. Whether in Russia, China, Europe, or North America, people needed fur for comfort and survival. Fur was Russia’s “soft gold” and the trade transformed Russian from a minor kingdom on the fringes of Europe to a major power.

Today we might think of the wealth of Siberia as oil or minerals, but in the 16th-19th centuries, the lure of fur pulled explorers and adventurers into the depths of Siberia seeking fox, sable, and marten. The potential for making a fortune was real and compelling and Nikolai Rezanov was about to become a major player.

Posted in Nikolai Rezanov, Russian American Company | Leave a comment

John Bidwell, Ag Promoter

A few paragraphs from an Address by Major John Bidwell to the California State Agricultural Society, 1860:

There is no reason why we cannot supply ourselves with the thousands of barrels, boxes, hogsheads, and casks, of dried apples, peaches, nuts, raisins, and other fruits which are constantly imported hither. It will not do to say that we cannot raise apples in California, for it is too well known that our mountains, the country along our extended sea coast, and numerous intermediate valleys, produce in abundance the finest apples in the world. . . .

Almonds grow to perfection here, and can be raised almost as easily as peaches and in quantities to supply all the markets on the Pacific Ocean. We can also grow the Persian Walnut, or Maderia Nut, and without doubt the Filbert also. . .

California is emphatically the land of the vine; and can there be any doubt that we can produce the finest wines? This is an important question, because we are actually importing in casks, barrels, baskets and cases, millions of gallons every year. And yet it is admitted that there is not a land beneath the sun better suited to grape culture than California. . . .

Of peaches and pears it would be vain to attempt description that would be credited abroad—to be appreciated they must be seen. No country can equal much less surpass them. The unbounded enterprise of our horticulturists, has done wonders in supplying the country with these as well as all other kinds of fruit, and to them the gratitude of the State is due for a large share of her prosperity and renown.

We are importing a hundred thousand dollars in figs and raisins almost every year, which can and should, and, by the aid of horticultural enterprise, will be with us as a home production.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

One Grand Fruit Orchard

sc10658 Almond Orchard, Bidwell Ranch ca 1895

I think this state is to be largely a fruit garden. I don’t think it is to be used continuously for the production of grain. Of course we will always produce cereals, but the capabilities of California are in the direction of fruit raising. It is capable of being made one grand fruit orchard. (Dictation 1891)

John Bidwell was not only prophetic in his assessment of California agriculture,  he was productive in making it a reality. Throughout his career he promoted the cultivation of all kinds of fruit and was continually planting out new orchards and experimenting with new varieties.

I’ve been reading his diary for January-February 1871 and it seems that every day he and his workers were preparing or planting out another orchard.

On January 18th he notes: Recd. trees from Robt. Williamson. Grape vines arrived from J.R. Nickerson. The next day: Hauled the Nickerson grape vines from Depot & heeled them in. The day after that he was in Sacramento: At Sacramento I went out to Capital Nursery & engaged White Muscat of Alexandria grapes – 2000 – also 50 Hales early peach.

The following week (Jan. 23-27) goes as follows: Tuesday: Set out black walnut trees; Wednesday: Set out peach trees; Thursday: Set out apple & plum trees; Friday: Setting out apple trees. The man never stopped. Then on February 2nd: Set out 100 Bartlet Pears and other trees. 50 Hale’s Early peach – 50 Early golden apricot – 100 cherries, etc.

If today in California we live in “one grand fruit orchard,” a good deal of the credit for bringing that about goes to John Bidwell.

Posted in fruit trees, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Come and Hear about Pres Longley

Pres Longley, the Bard of Butte

Pres Longley, the Bard of Butte

The Annual Meeting of the Bidwell Mansion Association is coming up on Sunday January 26, and John Rudderow and I will be speaking on our book The Miner Poet: Poems of Pres Longley. There is a reception at 5:30 (cookies, coffee, and lemonade), and the meeting is at 6:00 p.m. After a short business meeting, we will be speaking and answering questions.

If you like poetry, if you are interested in local history, or if you want to know more about what it was like to be a Gold Rush miner, please come. Pres Longley, the poet of Helltown and the bard of Butte, was well-known in for his verse, which appeared in local newspapers. He knew John Bidwell pretty well and was sometimes a guest at the Mansion.

It was Joseph Kennedy, Annie Bidwell’s father, who asked Pres, “Does poetry pay?'” Pres thought about that a moment, and then replied:

Does poetry pay?
No, not in dollars and cents.
But it must be inferred
There is some recompense.

The recompense for Pres was friendship and conviviality, a tale well-told and the occasional pie. If you would like to know more about our own miner poet, join us at Bidwell Mansion Visitor’s Center on January 26.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Planting Out Cherry Trees

January is the time for planting bare root fruit trees, whether you are planting now or in the 19th century. Here are two entries from John Bidwell’s 1871 diary:

Fri. January 6.
Setting out cherry trees – Ramage & choir met here to have a last sing – Present Judge Hallets, Harry Hallet – Warren – Farrell, Mrs. Clark & Misses Wilson & Allen. Weather beautiful – Mr. Cochran fell on his horse & was hurt –
Sat. January 7.
Day fine – Set out cherry trees – Cleared off garden on S. side of creek – Recd. money on Church note – and paid off debts – H.C. Bidwell arrd. from mts –

cherryHe planted the cherry orchard behind the Mansion. It later became the site of Chico Normal School. H. C. Bidwell was his half-nephew Henry C. Bidwell, son of his half-brother Daniel Bidwell. Henry became superintendent of the Plumas County Mining Company.

Posted in cherry orchard, fruit trees | Leave a comment

The Fate of the Sutter Gun

John Sutter’s little Russian 4-pounder wandered around a bit after the end of the Mexican War, from Monterey to Santa Barbara to San Francisco. When Captain Lippitt of the 7th New York Volunteers, in command of the garrison at Santa Barbara asked for an additional field piece, Colonel Jonathan D. Stevenson refused, writing in his letter to Lippitt that “The piece which you now have is an excellent one, probably one of the best in the country, known as the Sutter Gun. It has the admiration of all the participants in the glories of the Mesa and San Gabriel conflicts.”

In 1848, when the 7th New York Volunteers were mustered out, Captain Joseph Folsom (for whom the city of Folsom is named) returned the gun to John Sutter as his property. Sutter used it to fire salutes from Sutter’s Fort.

At this point gold had already been discovered at Sutter’s Mill by James Marshall. In the subsequent rush for gold, Sutter was overwhelmed by the squatters and thieves who swarmed over his vast land holdings. Unable to hold onto his employees and facing mounting debts, Sutter retired to his Hock Farm near Yuba City.

He took the cannon with him and used it to fire salutes to passing steamships on the Feather River. I can picture him, at ease on his veranda, with a glass of brandy in his hand, waving to a passing ship and ordering the gun to be fired.

Sutter's Hock Farm

Sutter’s Hock Farm

In 1865 the house at the Hock Farm burned to the ground and Sutter and his wife retired to Washington, D.C. where for years Sutter fruitlessly pursued a request to Congress for compensation of his losses in the war and the Gold Rush. On his departure he donated the Sutter Gun to the Society of California Pioneers in San Francisco. These it remained on display until the 1906 earthquake, when it disappeared in the fire.

Did it melt into a heap of slag? Was it jumbled into the rubble that was dumped into San Francisco Bay? Or is it still resting somewhere in hiding?

The cannon that is fired nowadays each day at noon at Sutter’s Fort is a replica, cast from a sister gun that went back to Sitka when the Russians left Fort Ross. So if you visit Sutter’s Fort and watch them fire the gun, you are seeing the Sutter Gun  . . . . almost.

Posted in Sutter Gun, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Adventures of the Sutter Gun, part 3

It’s a little tricky to trace the movements of the Sutter Gun during the Mexican War in California. When John Sutter returned to his home on the American River after the Micheltorena incident, his Russian 4-pound bronze cannon was left behind in Southern California.  Maybe it was taken to pieces and buried at the end of that little war, or maybe just left in someone’s front yard. Accounts differ. But when war broke out again between the Americans and the Mexicans, it was in the possession of the Mexicans.

In December 1846 Commodore Robert F. Stockton and an army of marines and sailors marched on Los Angeles from San Diego, while Fremont’s army approached from San Pedro. Entering Los Angeles they found that the pueblo had been abandoned by General Castro and his army, who took the Sutter Gun and other artillery with them.

Castro retreated toward the Colorado River. Finding that the artillery slowed him down, he buried the cannon in the sand. With his force, as a prisoner, was Captain Charles Weber, who noted the burial site. When Weber was released by Castro later in the march, he walked back to Los Angeles and told Stockton where to find the cannon.

(By the way, Weber, a German, came to California in the same emigrant company as John Bidwell. He served in both the Mexican and the American armies, became a wealthy merchant and gold-seeker, and founded the city of Stockton.)

As the Mexican War proceeded, the Sutter Gun was hauled all over Southern California to fight in every major battle. It took part in the Battle of San Pasqual, fought by General Stephen Watts Kearny and his dragoons who had just arrived in California after their long and wearisome march from Kansas. Dispatched by Stockton to bring relief to Kearny, Captain Archibald Gillespie took along the Sutter Gun. After intense hand-to-hand combat, “the Sutter” was brought up and the Californios retired from the field. Twenty-one Americans were killed and seventeen wounded, making the Battle of San Pasqual the bloodiest battle of the war in California.

Next “the Sutter” took part in the battles of Los Angeles and La Mesa. In the latter battle it was concealed within a defensive square of soldiers. As the Californio cavalry advanced on the square, it opened up and the Sutter Gun fired volleys of nails, chain, and scrap iron. The cavalry retreated and the battle was won by the American forces. It was the last battle of the war in California.

For a thorough account of these events, read The History of the Sutter Gun, by Morgan Blanchard.

Stay tuned to learn the fate of the Sutter Gun

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Adventures of the Sutter Gun (and John Bidwell too), Part 2

John Sutter wasn’t the only American to get a grant of land from Governor Manuel Micheltorena. The governor also gave John Bidwell a land grant, his first, at a site in the Sacramento Delta called Ulpinos. Micheltorena knew very well that the Californios disliked him and that a revolution was brewing. He hoped by granting land to men like Sutter and Bidwell to bring the Americans over to his side.

His ploy worked. Sutter put together a small army of Indians and Americans in his employ, and with John Bidwell serving as his aide-de-camp they left New Helvetia on January 1, 1845, taking the Sutter Gun with them. In Monterey they joined up with Micheltorena and the army moved southward. In was a long slow slog through the rain and the mud of a California winter. Bidwell later stated

“The varying scenes of that march, in the very wet and cold winter as it was, the transportation of baggage and ammunition on Mexican carts drawn by oxen over muddy roads, and through difficult passes I have no desire to recall or portray.”

The depredations of Micheltorena’s army drove the residents of California to the rebel side, and General Jose Castro was able to gather his own army of Californios and Americans. Near Los Angeles the two forces met in the Battle of Cahuenga, a battle that hardly deserves the name.

Both sides had about equal numbers, and both had artillery. They fired their cannons at each other, but only a mule was killed. Bidwell again:

“The artillery from both sides opened simultaneously at long range – Sutter with his American riflemen was directed to occupy a deep and winding gulch midway between the opposing forces and approach within rifle shot. Then for the first time the Americans with Sutter could plainly see that Castro had with him as many or more Americans than Micheltoreno.”

It wasn’t long before the Americans on both sides got together, started trading news from home, and decided to sit out the battle. Why should they kill each other over an argument about Mexican taxes?

But as aide-de-camp John Bidwell still had a job to do, carrying orders from Micheltorena to Sutter. He was captured by Castro’s soldiers, got away on his horse, and was captured again.

“Sutter & I started to rejoin Micheltorena – and were both taken prisoner by Castro’s forces, and were both conducted immediately to the presence of Castro which was at the adobe building of the Cahuenga Ranch. C received us in the most friendly manner threw his arms around Sutter – and called him his dear friend.”

Sutter might have been hung, but his old friend pardoned him and he was allowed to return to New Helvetia. The Sutter Gun stayed in Southern California. Micheltorena was put on a boat and sent back to Mexico. The Californios, eager to return to their ranchos and not needing a cannon, took the gun off its caisson and buried the pieces in the ground.

It would soon be resurrected, for the Bear Flag Revolt and the Mexican War were only a year away. But for the time being the Sutter Gun rested in somebody’s garden or field, and by the end of March 1845 John Bidwell was back at Sutter’s Fort, keeping the books and managing Sutter’s business affairs as before.

Stay tuned for more adventures of the Sutter Gun in the Mexican War.

Posted in Sutter Gun, Uncategorized | Leave a comment