The Scandalous Saga concluded

hill2

Mrs. Terry in mourning

Legal loose-ends remained to be tied up in the various cases brought forth by Sharon v. Sharon and Sharon v. Hill. Sarah Althea was still trying to establish that she had been married to William Sharon, so as to inherit her share of the property. There was a retrial of the divorce case, but Allie lost again. Her attorneys abandoned the case and her attempts to appeal came to naught. By the end of 1890 it was all over.

For the most part Allie stayed on the ranch near Fresno, mourning the death of her husband and protector, but in February 1892 she returned to San Francisco, exhibiting signs of mental illness. Her bizarre behavior put her name in the headlines once again.

The friends she was staying with reported her disappearance after a night spent pacing her room and raving. She heard voices and communed with spirits. She slept and ate little, and her appearance had greatly aged.

SFC18920215.1.1-6655-3559-999-821-499w

San Francisco Call, 15 February 1892

After she left the Culbreth home, she was found staying with her old friend, “Mammy” Pleasant. Mrs. Pleasant had supported her throughout her courtroom trials, and she again tried to help and protect her. But Allie was too much for her. She ruined fine clothing that Mrs. Pleasant gave her by continually pouring cold water over her head or laying in a bathtub for hours fully clothed. She had to be watched constantly to keep her from wandering off. Feeling she could no longer sustain her friend, Mrs. Pleasant had her arrested on an insanity petition. Allie appeared in court for the last time on March 10, 1892, where she put up a lively defense of herself, but also betrayed the sad condition of her mental capacities.

SFC18920311.1.7-3911-230-993-777-248w

The judge declared her insane and committed her to the state asylum. The next day she was taken to Stockton.

Sarah Althea Terry spent the next 45 years living in the state asylum. She was never considered a danger to herself or anyone else. She continued to think of herself as a grand society belle and dressed in her fine Victorian gowns and hats. She wrote checks on scraps of paper and gave them to other patients. She could talk lucidly on many topics and yet she also told delusional tales of past and present grandeur.

Sarah Althea Hill Terry died on February 14, 1937, long after all the other participants in her drama had left the stage.

 

 

Posted in Sharon v. Hill, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Scandalous Saga continued — Showdown at the Depot

DAC18890815.1.1-1064-862-961-1885-240w

Daily Alta California, 15 August 1889

Justice Stephen J. Field had earned the undying enmity of the Terrys when he ruled against them in September 1888, and even more so when he sent them to jail for their violent antics in court. David S. Terry, who thirty years earlier had shot David C. Broderick in a duel, was still a man who knew how to hold a grudge. And how to act on it.

Terry served his six months in the Alameda County Jail and then retired to his ranch near Fresno. There is no indication that he laid plans against Judge Field. Only a happenstance encounter at the Lathrop Railroad Depot brought the drama to its bloody end.

Because Terry had uttered verbal and written threats against Field, a deputy U.S. marshal was assigned to Field as a bodyguard when Field returned from Washington, D.C. to California to sit on federal cases in the Ninth Circuit. The deputy marshal was David Neagle, the same man who had disarmed David Terry during the melee in the courtroom the previous September.

DAC18890815.1.1-4738-1661-969-829-484w

Daily Alta California, 15 August 1889

Field and Neagle boarded a train in Los Angeles on August 13th, 1889, bound for San Francisco. Knowing that Terry lived near Fresno, Neagle watched as the train took on passengers in Fresno at midnight. He saw the Terrys as they boarded. They were unaware that their nemesis was aboard the same train.

Early in the morning the train stopped at Lathrop, a town just south of Stockton. Passengers alighted to take breakfast in the depot hotel. Field and Neagle had just sat down to eat when the marshal saw the Terrys enter the restaurant. Allie (Mrs. Terry) wheeled around and went back to the railroad car to get her handbag (where she kept a pistol). David Terry went to sit at a table, and then spying Justice Field, he walked over to where the judge was seated, came up behind him, and slapped him twice on the face.

Neagle yelled “Stop that!” and placed himself between Terry and Judge Field. Quickly  pulling his revolver, he thrust it against Terry’s chest and fired. As Terry collapsed to the floor, he fired again at his head.

act2scene1

The restaurant erupted in pandemonium as some customers fled the room and others moved to surround Terry’s body. Neagle loudly  declared himself an officer of the law. At that moment Allie came into the room, saw her husband lying on the floor covered in blood, and rushed to him to cradle his head and weep over his body.

Sarah swore out an arrest warrant against Deputy Neagle and Justice Field for the murder of her husband.  Both were arrested and Deputy Neagle was taken to jail, but Justice Field was released on his own recognizance. The charges against Field were later dropped. Neagle’s case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld his actions “as he was acting under the authority of the law of the United States.”

This incident, and the precedent it set in the case of Deputy Neagle, is lad out in full at the webpage for the U.S. Marshals Service.

Next: The Sad End of Sarah Althea Hill Sharon Terry

Posted in Sharon v. Hill, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Scandalous Saga continued — Disorder in the Court

Sarah Althea Hill, now Mrs. David S. Terry, along with her attorney-husband, were back on court on September 3, 1888 to hear the decision in one of the appeals. The California Supreme Court had supported the lower state court ruling that the marriage was legitimate, but the federal court had ruled just the opposite — the marriage contract was invalid. Justice Stephen J. Field would now pronounce on the appeal to the federal court’s decision.

800px-STField-SCjustice2Field was the judge who replaced Terry on the California Supreme Court in 1856. In 1863 he was appointed by President Lincoln to the newly created tenth Supreme Court seat. This seat had been added to give balance to the court by bringing in a justice from the Pacific states. (That’s a nice bit of trivia — When were there ever ten supreme court justices?)

At the time, the U.S. supreme court justices also were responsible for the federal circuit courts, and it was in this capacity that Justice Field gave his ruling that the federal judgement would stand. He ordered Mrs. Terry (Allie) to surrender the marriage contract.

Allie was outraged. She had guarded that precious contract as her only means of getting her alimony. She not only refused to give it up, she went further. She accused Justice Field of having been bought off by the “Sharon people.”

DAC18880904.1.4-1674-2925-829-763-414w

Daily Alta California, 4 September 1888

act1scene2Justice Field was not going to stand for that. He ordered the marshal to remove Mrs. Terry from the courtroom. As she continued to revile the judge, the marshal moved to take her out. Her husband, David Terry, stopped him, declaring “No living man shall touch her!’ and then struck the marshal in the face with his fist. As the marshal dragged Allie screaming out of the courtroom, Terry hastened after, drawing his Bowie knife as he went.

 

DAC18880904.1.4-1682-4557-823-564-411w

Daily Alta California, 4 September 1888

Terry, struggling to strike a blow with the knife, was overpowered and disarmed. A loaded revolver was found in Allie’s satchel. Screams and shouts filled the courtroom.

The members of the press were having a field day. What a way to sell papers! The headline in the Morning Press was “TERRYFIED.”

But Stephen Field was not cowed or terrified by this display of violence. After the mid-day recess he came back and sentenced David D. Terry, former Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, to six months in jail for contempt of court, and his wife to 30 days.

While in jail, Allie continued to rail against Justice Field, and her husband, Terry, sent the judge several threatening letters. In less than a year, the tragic end of the Sharon-Hill-Terry drama would play out in a railroad depot dining room.

Next: Showdown at the Lathrop Depot

 

 

Posted in Sharon v. Hill, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Tempestuous Life of David S. Terry

The most famous duel in California history took place in 1859 between David S. Terry, Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, and U.S. Senator David C. Broderick.

david terryDavid Smith Terry was born in Kentucky in 1823 and moved with his family to Texas as  young boy.  All his life he considered himself a southerner and supported the southern cause. He studied law in Texas and was admitted to the bar in 1845, fought in the Mexican War in 1846, and in 1849 joined the gold rush to California. Like many others, he found riches not in the diggings, but in his professional field. He rose rapidly in the ranks of law and politics and in 1855 he won a seat on the California Supreme Court, supported by the Know-Nothing Party. Other than that, Terry considered himself a Democrat.

At 6 foot 3 inches, Terry was an imposing figure. He was known for his hot temper. In 1856, representing the state government, he went to San Francisco to take on the Vigilance Committee, an extra-legal band of citizens formed to fight crime and corruption. In an altercation he stabbed Sterling A. Hopkins in the neck with a Bowie knife. Terry was jailed, but released when Hopkins survived the attack.

TerryStabbingMahoney-sized

DavidBroderick-sizedIn 1859 Terry failed in his bid to be re-elected to the Supreme Court, and he blamed his loss on fellow Democrat David C. Broderick. Terry was a leader of the southern faction of the party; Broderick represented the northern abolitionist wing. The former friends fell out over their irreconcilable political views (as did the entire Democratic Party soon after).

They traded insults until Terry sent a note demanding a retraction of remarks made by Broderick. His refusal to do so led to their meeting at Lake Merced (just outside San Francisco city limits in Daly City) early on the morning of September 13, 1859. Broderick fell, fatally wounded by a pistol ball. His death made him a hero and martyr in the fight against slavery, and Terry’s political career was ruined.

You can read more about the Broderick-Terry Duel in this Wikipedia article and at this National Park Service site.

AAA-9219

IMG_0761

The two pillars mark the spots where Terry and Broderick stood to fire

Just then the Civil War came along, and Terry went back to Texas and joined the Confederate Army, rising to the rank of colonel. After the war he returned to California and resumed his legal practice.

In 1884 he became part of the team of lawyers assisting Sarah Althea Hill in her bid to get her marriage to former senator William Sharon validated and then dissolved. In December of the same year Terry’s wife, Charlotte, died. In January 1886 he married his client, Allie. Together, with great determination, they continued to pursue her right to a portion of property belong to millionaire Sharon, who had died in 1885.

Public interest in the case languished for two years, although the lawyers were busy with a few side issues. Then in 1888 drama erupted once again in the courtroom.

Next: “Marshal. put that woman out!”

 

Posted in Sharon v. Hill, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Blooming Bonanza

DSCF6906 (2)

The view in Upper Bidwell Park

It’s a great year for wildflowers — get out and enjoy them while they last. Today I went to Upper Bidwell Park to hike around a bit and see what’s in bloom. There are plenty of—

DSCF6902 (2)

Blue dicks

DSCF6909 (2)

Popcorn flower

DSCF6911 (2)

Bird’s eye gilia (and a little bit of goldfields)

DSCF6910 (2)

Frying-pans (a kind of California poppy)

DSCF6912 (2)

Fiddlenecks

DSCF6904 (2)

Goldfields — endless swaths of them

DSCF6913 (2)

Tidytips — mostly seen near the parking lot

DSCF6900 (2)

Something new (to me) — California Man-root (Marah fabacea)

DSCF6916 (2)

And old Monkeyface Rock watching over it all. Get out and enjoy before the summer hits us!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Scandalous Saga continued — No Palimony for Allie

DAC18851227.1.2-86-183-951-677-475w

Daily Alta California, 27 December 1885

Senator Sharon’s suit against Sarah Althea Hill concluded in December 1885. The federal court had spent more than a year going over the same ground that the superior court of California had thoroughly dug up in 1884 and Judge Deady came to the opposite conclusion of Judge Sullivan. He ruled that there had never been a marriage between Sharon and Miss Hill. The marriage contract was a forgery and the “Dear Wife” letters had nothing wifely about them.

DAC18851227.1.2-1024-5153-933-323-466w

Daily Alta California, 27 December 1885

sharon---libr-congr02

William Sharon

The former senator and wealthy man about town was deprived of the satisfaction of this vindication. In November 1885, a month before the judge gave his decision, rich old William Sharon passed away. Allie now claimed to be his widow, but under the court ruling, Allie was neither wife nor widow.

The judge came down hard on Allie. He found her conduct to be “contumacious, frivolous, and contradictory” and her testimony “reckless, improbable and false.” Nellie Brackett recanted her testimony and said that she had helped to forge the documents. As far as Judge Deady was concerned, Allie was a fraudulent adventuress.

Allie shed no tears for the man she had claimed as husband. The decision was no sooner handed down than she married David S. Terry, one of her attorneys, Together they continued to fight for her right to half of Sharon’s considerable property. Appeals were filed in both courts against both rulings, for and against her. Allie could still hope that someday she would profit from the whole vexatious kerfuffle.

TerryDavidLawyer

David S. Terry

In the meantime, she was legitimately Mrs. David S. Terry, married by a Catholic priest at St. Mary’s Church in Stockton on January 7th, 1886, less than two weeks after the end of the federal case. This wedding came complete with witnesses, a public ceremony, a marriage certificate, and a ring. There would be nothing secret or contentious about this marriage. The bride was thirty-two years old; the groom was sixty-two.

David Terry was a man who, as a newspaper reporter stated, was “both feared and respected throughout the San Joaquin Valley.” He had a large ranch near Fresno, a handsome home in Stockton, and a successful career as a politician and attorney. His wife had died the previous year, and over the course of the Sharon v. Sharon trial, he had become close to his attractive, if volatile, young client.

He was famous as a former California Supreme Court Justice and a tough fighter in a courtroom. But what made him notorious was the second most famous duel in American history.

Next: A Look Back at the Terry-Broderick Duel

Posted in Sharon v. Hill | Leave a comment

The Scandalous Saga continued — in Federal Court

No sooner was the divorce trial of Sarah Althea Hill and Senator William Sharon concluded in Sarah Althea’s favor, than the federal suit brought by Sharon against Allie began. It took up most of the year 1885 and went over much the same ground.

At the same time a number of spin-off suits were being pursued. Senator Sharon, of course, appealed the divorce decision. At the same time, Allie sued him for her alimony, which he refused to pay. The attorneys in the case and a variety of witnesses were sued for a variety of causes: libel, contempt of court, fraud, and obscenity were some of the charges. The obscenity charge was brought against Allie’s attorney G. W. Tyler for calling Neilson (the man who started the whole thing) an “infernal puppy.” Such language!

DAC18850804.1.1-1926-737-953-1227-476w

Daily Alta California, 4 August 1885

All of this was wearing on the lady, and she was getting desperate, for her money and for the whole thing to be over.  During testimony by an expert being questioned about the authenticity of the marriage contract, Allie kept up a steady stream of abuse and threats against Senator Sharon and his attorneys, Barnes and Evans, loud enough to be heard throughout the courtroom. Then Evans noticed that she was fingering a revolver on the table in front of her.

DAC18850804.1.1-1956-4443-911-713-455w

Daily Alta California, 4 August 1885

(Although referred to as “Judge” Evans, he was not the sitting judge in this case, but Sharon’s attorney.)

Sarah (who I have mostly called Allie) was severely reprimanded by Federal Justice Stephen J. Field. We shall see how Field’s involvement in the case would come to endanger his life. In the meantime, a deputy marshal was assigned to “take all such measures as may be necessary to disarm the said defendant and keep her disarmed and under strict surveillance” in the court.

 

 

 

Posted in Sharon v. Hill | Leave a comment

Sharon v. Hill Meets The Wasp

The Wasp was a satirical weekly published in San Francisco from 1876 until 1941. Its editor from 1881 to 1885 was that acerbic wit, Ambrose Bierce. Here is the cover of the magazine for May 17, 1884. At this point the divorce trial was in full swing, the case having begun on September 8, 1883 with William Sharon’s arrest for adultery. The Wasp showed the players “Anno Domini 1910” — what they would look like if the trial dragged on for another 26 years.

hb9q2nb3kd-FID3

Central in the cover are William Sharon, looking like a skeleton, and Sarah Althea, bedecked with roses. She was known for the elaborately fashionable costumes she wore in the courtroom. At upper and middle left are Sharon’s two attorneys, William Barnes and O.P. Evans. Top and middle right are G.W. Tyler and David Terry, attorneys for Sarah Althea, along with Tyler’s son, “Young Tyler,” top center.

Across the bottom are Ki, Sharon’s Chinese manservant, Judge Sullivan, sound asleep, and Mrs. Mary Ellen Pleasant, here labeled Mrs. Plaisance. The newspapers invariably  referred to her as Mammy Pleasant, although she detested that nickname. She was a successful San Francisco businesswoman, and was frequently in the courtroom as a friend and supporter of Allie. She was also a handsome woman who did not look anything like this caricature. But this kind of casual racism was what you got in 19th century journalism.

pleasant2

Possibly Mary Ellen Pleasant

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Scandalous Saga continued — Mrs. Sharon’s Triumph

The trial came to a conclusion on September 16, 1884 and after due consideration, judgement was rendered by Judge J.F. Sullivan on December 24th. He concluded that under California law a marriage contract such as Sarah Althea Hill claimed she possessed could be valid. He accepted that both the contract and the “Dear Wife” letters were genuine, and he granted her a dissolution of the marriage between her and her husband, William Sharon.

He also believed that both plaintiff (Allie) and defendant (Sharon), as well as many of the witnesses, were guilty of perjury on the stand. Nevertheless, Allie was entitled to alimony and a division of property. Sharon swore that she would not get one cent. He would fight it to the end.

While her attorneys congratulated each other and celebrated their victory, Allie went shopping. A reporter from the Daily Alta California visited her the day after Christmas and found her relaxing “on a richly embroidered lounge,” next to a table “almost covered with glasses and champagne bottles, some empty and others yet to be opened,” evidence that she had been called upon by many well-wishers. He noted some of the purchases she made on Christmas Eve.

DAC18841226.1.1-2004-5025-935-583-467w

Daily Alta California, 26 December 1884

She certainly enjoyed her Christmas. But her ordeal was far from over, and she would never see the money she had worked and schemed so hard for. Senator Sharon appealed the decision and delayed payment with all his considerable craftiness. And then, lurking in the background, was the counter-suit that he had filed in federal court.  Allie would soon find herself once again in the courtroom.

Posted in Sharon v. Hill, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Scandalous Saga continued — Sharon Takes the Stand

Ex-Senator of Nevada William Sharon finally took the stand to tell his story late in May of 1884. Sarah Althea Hill, he said, had first come to his office in August, 1880, ostensibly seeking investment advice. He told her that he did not give such advice, but they chatted amiably for about a half an hour. He denied ever dictating or seeing a marriage contract and he also repudiated the “Dear Wife” letters. He said he may have written some of these, but the word “wife” was a forgery.

 

He gave his version of how their relationship developed.

DAC18840527.1.1-1072-3237-929-1013-464w

Daily Alta California, 27 May 1884

William Sharon had no hesitation in presenting himself as both a hard-headed businessman and a cold-hearted lover. As far as he was concerned, the liaison was a strictly financial transaction. He was completely cynical about the business. When asked why he thought she would respond to his offer he said:

DAC18840528.1.1-1074-6291-949-167-474w

Daily Alta California, 28 May 1884

Eventually he tired of Allie’s requests for additional money and her emotional antics. She was interfering with business and taking liberties. So he had no qualms about discarding her and moving on. But she was not so easily gotten rid of.

One time she climbed over a transom to get into his rooms and fell in a heap on the floor. He told her, “I wish you had broken your d — d neck.” Another time she hid in a closet, giving his Chinese manservant Ki a fright. He finally had to pay her off with money to finance a trip East to study acting.

DAC18840528.1.1-94-6035-975-1241-487w

Daily Alta California, 28 May 1884

At the end of his testimony, Sharon had to admit that he was “habitually free with women” and that he had had other mistresses, but Allie was the only one he had introduced to some of his friends and family, or invited to his mansion at Belmont, or had allowed to live in his hotel.  With that the case rested until July, when the judge would give his ruling.

Posted in Sharon v. Hill | Leave a comment